4 posts categorized "your business"

March 12, 2012

Once Is Not Enough: Optimize Repeat Before Trial

Think about how often you check Facebook. Some of us spend more time on the site than others, but 50% of users go back every day. When you’re building a new product, that kind of addictive experience has got to be your goal. You’re facing three challenges: awareness, trial, and repeat. You’ve got to make sure people know your product exists, and then you’ve got to convince those people to actually try it out. Then you’ve got to make those people repeat using it - as often as possible.

I recently met with a new app company that’s absolutely crushing that first challenge. A chart of their new user trial looks like a hockey stick, curving up and to the right - a kind of rapid growth that’s very impressive, and very hard to achieve. The company was successfully using Facebook and Twitter to virally spread awareness, and the idea of their product was interesting enough to get people who became aware of it to try it.

There’s just one problem: Only 1 out of every 5 people who tried the product would come back to use it again. And those who did repeat were doing so sporadically, at best.

I asked them about those repeat numbers, and they said they were focusing on driving trials right now. They were celebrating. I wasn’t.

It’s really hard to get people to try something new. To lose 80% of the people who actually care enough to check your product out is tragic.

Trial is important. But I’d suggest focusing on what will get people to keep coming back before you spend a lot of time getting them to show up once. Repeat users create value. Facebook’s addicted user base is the reason its valuation is sky-high. I saw Twitter’s repeat recently, and it’s confidential, but let me tell you, it’s stunning.

You’ve got to understand what drives repeat for your product. Why are users not coming back? What characteristics do repeat and non-repeat users have in common? Are repeat users doing something different with the product than one-time visitors? If you’re able to show strong repeat rates and gather useful data about that cohort of visitors, you’ll definitely be able to get people to try out the product -- and you’ll be able to raise money to help make that happen.

What other products are you aware of with fantastic repeat rates?

March 08, 2012

Stock Options: Avoiding Awkward Conversations

In a start-up, there are no secrets. Sooner or later, everybody knows everybody else’s business. For founders, that means your decisions about salary and stock options are inevitably going to be gossiped about.

And in a market where companies are fighting over the best talent, those conversations can get awkward, fast. Say you’re trying to hire a great new engineer, and you end up adding another fraction of a percent to her equity offer to close the deal. Now she’s got a little more of a stake in the company than other folks at her level. When the last engineer you hired finds out what her offer looked like, you’re going to be having a difficult conversation.

I recently worked with a company, OpenBook, that’s found a way to avoid this problem. The founders are two serial entrepreneurs, and in their first company they basically set up the equity structure for their own benefit. They’d grant just as much stock as they had to, and no more. That meant different employees ended up with very different kinds of deals.


As the company grew, the problem got worse. It wasn’t easy for the founders to go back and grant more equity to an employee who’d gotten short-changed when he was hired, because the Board of Directors wasn’t thrilled about the idea of shrinking the pool of options. And as we’ve seen with the recent legal actions at Zynga, taking away equity from people who were given too much doesn’t work out that well, either! In the case of these two entrepreneurs, some of the key employees started
to complain that their shares weren’t fair in relation to the founders’ shares.

So when these entrepreneurs founded OpenBook, they decided to never have this problem again. Here’s how they did it.

The first step was simple: Before granting any equity, they came up with a compensation plan organized by employees’ responsibility levels and join dates. And they followed it.

Now, after a new employee signs an offer but before they actually start work, one of the founders will sit down with that person and go through the entire company’s capitalization table, explaining who owns how much of a stake. They answer any and all questions. If necessary, they’re prepared to justify every single person’s compensation. (They’ll admit that this practice is brutal and time-consuming.)

They’re also granting larger equity packages than most start-ups, and reducing their own ownership. They believe that this will help them attract, retain, and motivate a better team, and that will grow the value of the entire company, actually making them more money in the end.

It’s working. They’ve got an all-star development team. A lot of their employees have been recruited by other team members. They’ve been able to build and launch a very strong product – and within a week of the launch, they’d already signed up more than 600 customers! And most importantly, you can just feel a difference when you walk into their office. Even I, as an outsider, could tell how happy the employees were to be working in a system they believed was truly fair, and how much that happiness fueled their creative energy.

March 02, 2012

Car Sharing: Disrupt Hertz (please!)

The car-sharing companies that I have met are quick to point out the size of the rental car market, and the number of hours our cars are just sitting around, waiting to be driven. And by any analysis, it’s certainly a huge market. Tapping into that market could be a huge opportunity - but there are challenges. For one thing, we know that it’s really hard to change consumer habits. And creating a liquid market for cars in many small locations is a big challenge, too. If I need a car, but there isn’t one available where I am, the model has failed. If I have a car sitting around ready to rent, but there’s nobody there to rent it, the model has failed.

Here’s an idea for a solution that I’d love to see someone try. You’d hijack an established consumer habit - airport car rental - and get around the supply-and-demand problem by focusing on a few major airports to start.

Short-term parking is always much easier to get to than long-term parking, and it’s often easier to access than rental cars. I travel a lot, and the short-term lots are always full. Business people use them to save time, and expense the cost. Families use them because it’s too much hassle to schlep the kids and the luggage all the way to long-term parking.

But short-term parking is costing me (or my business) $35+ a day, and my car is just sitting around. What if I could rent out my car while I’m away? I’d save the cost of parking, and make some extra money.

Here’s how it could work: When I park my car in short-term parking, I enter the location in an app (as a bonus, it’ll help me remember where I parked). I also enter how long I’ll be away. The worst case scenario for me is, I pay for parking the same as always. In the best case, I cut my parking costs and earn some money on the side.

When you want to rent a car, you can book it ahead of time. If there’s no car-share available when you arrive, your reservation automatically gets kicked over to a traditional car rental company. (This doesn’t hurt our business’s bottom line, because we don’t have to pay for reservations or for not showing up for a reservation.) In the worst-case scenario for you, you rent a car from a national chain, just like you always used to. In the best case, you rent a car parked in a more convenient location that’s probably better than the cars offered by the national chain.

What do you think? What other challenges do you see with this approach? What solutions can you think of?  Interested...let's talk!

January 18, 2012

Fire your customers and shut the doors… or be a services firm forever

I recently spent some time with a company that successfully overcame a huge challenge: Changing business models. ProdNotServ started out as an outsourced software development service company, run by a very talented small team – three engineers, a designer, and a product manager. For two years, things had been going great. They had more demand for their services than they could handle. They were working with big-name startups and celebrities. They were getting rave reviews
from clients.

So why make a change? They decided that because they weren’t building a product themselves, they were missing out on a chance to grow revenues faster than their billable hours and staff.

Sure, as a service company, they had some advantages. They had the engineering and design talent that so many early-stage companies need these days. There were startups flush with VC cash lining up to pay this team to help develop their products. Plus, they enjoyed steady cash flow, control over their own schedules, and minimal risk. Working with different clients added some variety to their days.


But if they successfully made their own product, they’d not only get the feeling of ownership that comes from creating something entirely new, they’d be giving themselves a chance to make a lot more money.

ProdNotServ was able to make this difficult transition because its CEO made two key decisions. First, he created a cash reserve by taking only his salary, instead of distributing the firm’s net earnings to himself and the other owners. Next, he led his team to shut their doors for a year – stop taking on new business, and just use the cash reserve they’d built up to keep paying everyone their current salaries. They’d spend the year they’d bought themselves brainstorming, designing, and perfecting a product they’d come up with as a group.

It’s also important to note what the CEO did not do. There were a few common mistakes he managed to avoid: He didn’t try to keep building the service business, just putting a fraction of the company’s time and money towards building the product. Instead, he focused all of his team’s energy on the new idea. He didn’t steal the best ideas from the product design process to drum up more easy cash from the services business. Instead, he stuck with his new vision for the company’s future. And he didn’t doubt himself or lose sight of that new vision when team members questioned his strategy, or when product development hit snags.

One year later, the team has just launched a third version of their product, and it’s selling pretty steadily. They’re about to close their first round of VC funding. In other words, they’ve done it.

You can’t develop a successful product part-time. Can anyone name a product launched by a company still mostly focused on services? What about one that doesn’t suck?

Alex Kinnier

Alex Kinnier is a Venture Captial Partner at NEA. He's an Xoogler, a passionate product developer (from ad servers to air conditioners to Febreze) and a fan of NYC pizza. He is a father of 2 angels.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • RSS